With Election Day less than three weeks away, President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are trying to sway undecided voters, and many of these voters, as they did in 2016, are keeping their choice secret.
In the aftermath of the election four years ago, Michael Slepian, the Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Associate Professor of Leadership and Ethics, and a team of researchers recruited a sample of 1,000 voters who kept their ballot decisions to themselves.
What they found surprised them.
“We imagined that we would end up with a sample mostly secretly supporting Hillary Clinton, such as women in red states who didn’t want to tell their husbands they voted for her,” Slepian says. “But the people in our data were overwhelmingly Trump supporters.”
In research published in Motivation Science, Slepian, along with CBS adjunct professor Rachel McDonald, Katharine Greenaway of the University of Melbourne, and Jessica Salerno of Arizona State University, explored the reasons why voters kept their choices secret from those close to them.
For the study, researchers sought voters who told people they voted for one candidate, but actually voted for their opponent.
According to the paper, the three key reasons voters kept the truth about their votes to themselves were reputational concerns, fear of being ostracized by a group, and the desire to preserve a sense of harmony with close friends and loved ones.
Slepian says that keeping a secret creates a profound burden, a feeling that is exacerbated in the realm of politics, where passions often run high.
According to the research, those keeping a secret are not harmed in conversations with people that they are not close to; rather, it is in private moments, often when they are alone, that people experience negative emotions.
“The more people are concerned about their reputations, the more they find themselves ruminating on that secret, and even regretting their decision,” Slepian says. “It seems that having to think about feeling inauthentic is where the problem lies.”
Keeping your political preferences to yourself also affects the quality of conversations that might inform, or even change, your vote.
“If people have honest and frank conversations, that improves their ability to vote the way they want to, or in the way they deem to be in the best interest of others,” Slepian says. “If people are not participating in those talks anymore, and are keeping their vote secret, it reduces dialogue.”
With early voting for the 2020 election already underway, Slepian believes that secret voters will again be relevant, but in a slightly different manner.
“In 2016, Trump was a total outsider who had exhibited some controversial and problematic behavior,” he says. “I think people were concerned about voicing support for him and that was one reason they did not want others to know that they had voted for him.”
But now that Trump is the incumbent, his supporters might be less secretive about casting their vote for him.
“Typically, it would be less controversial to back a sitting president,” Slepian says. “Perhaps, for this reason, some will be more vocal of their support this time around, yet given the latest approval ratings, some backers may again worry about the reputational consequences of their support.”
But what about secret Biden voters?
“Location really matters. Those states that we expect Trump to win, where he is especially popular, I would expect Biden voters in those states to be more secretive about their support,” Slepian said. “This might mean avoiding a conflict with a friend or loved one, but it also means reduced debate and dialogue.”
For more on Professor Slepian’s research on secrets, listen to his interview on Bizcast, CBS’s podcast.
Firms With Overseas Networks Had an Early Warning About COVID-19
Companies with networks in China and Italy responded to the pandemic and enacted work-from-home policies faster than local governments.
The Best of Bizcast 2020
A look back at some of our most popular podcasts from 2020.
The Key to Solving Deadlocked Boards
New research finds that deadlocked boards lead to entrenched CEOs and argues in favor of director term limits.
A Wall Street Couple Is Bringing Diversity Conversations to the Table
Anjelica Watson ’13 and John Watson ’13 on how to broach conversations on race and inclusion in the workplace.
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world of business, while bringing historical inequities and injustice into sharp relief.
Subscribe to Leading Through Change to receive the latest insights from Columbia Business School to help you navigate this unprecedented time.